15.09
2009

UK gaming site TheSixthAxis has published a guest writer piece, Consoles Vs PC, arguing that some PC gamers are elitist. I’d like to argue that some sweeping generalisations are tired and inaccurate.

Lets deal with the main purpose of the article straight off: Yes, some PC gamers are elitist. So what? Specifying a trait exhibited by some members of a massive community of people is neither helpful, revelatory, nor the basis of a post. For instance: some Led Zeppelin fans make good lasagna; some console gamers are both immature and borderline illiterate. For example, as a beta tester for SCEE I often have cause to visit the European Playstation forums and, in a misguided attempt to engage the community, started a PC gaming thread. To quote one post to the thread:

EPIC GEEK FEST! sorry, i’m just not a fan of PC Gamers, they mostly seem really nerdy and those sort of poeple [sic] who take deep breathes [sic] after saying something. and talk really loads [sic] with enthusiasm and lie all the time about stuff. and think there no [sic] EVERYTHING.

I’d be offended if I could even decipher what he was trying to say. The point, though, is that I have no desire to go on about the attitude of console gamers because it would be a pointless generalisation that bore little in relation to the attitude of the majority.

Back to the original article and it appears that the writer’s main problem with the PC elitists is how they always keep banging on about how much better a mouse and keyboard is for FPSs than a control pad. That this is his only criticism of the attitude of PC gamers seems strange given that I can think of three or four ways that some PC gamers can be elitist that have nothing to do with control systems. The control system argument is a somewhat flawed criticism for the simple fact that it is largely true. Developers themselves seem pretty convinced of this as evidenced by the fact that they will generally implement aim-assist in the console versions of their shooters. They also tend to avoid online shooters that have cross platform play between the PC and a console, because of the assumed advantage it gives PC players.

None of this actually comes close to my main problem. My main problem is this: Don’t criticise PC gamers of being elitist by being elitist toward PC gamers through use of the same old repetitive clichés that don’t stand up to even the most basic scrutiny.

If they want to play a brand new game, they need to buy that, as well as have a half-decent graphics card and the likes.  We don’t need that, all we need is the relevant console, so they must be very bitter about having to upgrade all the time, and it’s not cheap either.

Actually the majority of PC gaming is done on pretty basic machines thanks to the indie and casual gaming scenes, as well as the two most popular games in all of gaming-land: World of Warcraft and The Sims 2. Even if you don’t take that into account his statement simply isn’t true. My current PC is 18 months old, and the graphics card in it was released 3 years ago. It is still more than capable of playing all modern releases on the highest settings and when that stops being the case I’ll still have the ‘high’ and ‘medium’ settings to look forward to. One of the advantages with an open platform is that it requires developers to tailor their games to suit a range of graphical settings. Can you live with slightly lower detail shadowing? Do you really need to have full anisotropic filtering? No? Congratulations, you’ve just bought yourself another couple of years of life out of your graphics card. This is unlike when a new generation of consoles are released and you’re forced to upgrade or miss out on the majority of new releases.

Also, [consoles] give you a standardised control input system, which is fantastic; developers can map functions and moves to pre-defined buttons and combinations, and it just feels better holding a hand-sized controller, instead of a flat keyboard and a cheap mouse from Tesco’s.

I don’t even understand the point he’s trying to make about mapping functions, as this is something I’ve done on both console and PC games. As for the cheap mouse jibe, my mouse came with my computer for free and was designed by someone who understood ergonomics so I fail to see the problem.

This is probably starting to sound like the rantings of PC gaming fanboy but, owning all but one of the current generation of platforms, I probably do the majority of my gaming on consoles. Had I seen an article bemoaning how bad consoles were compared to the PC I’d probably be writing this article from the opposite perspective because, at any level, fanboyism is a tiresome fanatical allegiance to something that is, essentially, nothing more than a personal preference.

2 comments so far

Add Your Comment
  1. I think *the* biggest flaws in criticising PC gaming is expense and elitism. Most people already own a computer, but if you want a console, it’s another piece of equipment you have to go out and buy. Purchasing each generation of specialised gaming technology actually seems more, not less, elitist than buying games for a machine you’ve got in the house already, and will be upgrading every few years anyway, and will be buying/ using peripherals for anyway.

    Also, i’m quite surprised to learn that you can buy cheap keyboards and mice at tescos. I will be sure to let all my gaming buddies know!

  2. You are SO right.
    If PC gamers are “elitist”, “nerdy” and if PC gaming is “expensive”, then I guess console gamers are “illiterate” and “lazy” and console gaming is “dumbed down”.
    To some extent, these criticisms are all true. But for the love of Bob stop rehashing them. What I find especially infuriating is the legion of commenters going “oh hey good article man I’ve always been a console gamer”, because they show what these articles are really about: uninformed bashing of the other guy so you can feel superior and better about your own way of “life”.

    Looks like even the author of the article isn’t “really a PC gamer”, has “a couple of games on Steam, and some C&C games, that’s about it really”. *sigh*

    Some people just need to grow up. And learn how to write proper articles.

    In any case, I play on the PC because I like tinkering with stuff. I put together my own system, and the whole “putting things together” part is already a large portion of the fun. I also like to have all options available to me. I use this box as a work PC, a gaming PC and a HTPC. The PC also happens to have the broadest selection of games, especially if you count emulators and mods. A PC is simply the best option for me. That doesn’t make me an elitist. Likewise, if a console is the best option for you, that’s fine, too.

    In related news, it’s looking increasingly likely that I’ll be buying a few of them “consoles” myself soon. My girlfriend wants a Wii, and with the impending price-cut I just might indulge her. And I myself would like a PS3 to play Heavy Rain and Brütal Legend. There’s also Alan Wake, but there’s still a chance that one will come to the PC eventually so I can’t justify purchasing a 360…